Home » Surveyors of Custom: American Literature as Cultural Analysis by Joel Pfister
Surveyors of Custom: American Literature as Cultural Analysis Joel Pfister

Surveyors of Custom: American Literature as Cultural Analysis

Joel Pfister

Published
ISBN : 9780190276157
Hardcover
288 pages
Enter the sum

 About the Book 

In 1850, Nathaniel Hawthorne, fired from Salems Custom House and returning to writing, reconceived his old job title, Surveyor of Customs, as his new one. Taking seriously this naming of the American authors project, Joel Pfister argues thatMoreIn 1850, Nathaniel Hawthorne, fired from Salems Custom House and returning to writing, reconceived his old job title, Surveyor of Customs, as his new one. Taking seriously this naming of the American authors project, Joel Pfister argues that writers from Benjamin Franklin to Louise Erdrich can be read as critical surveyors of customs, culture, hegemony, capitalisms emotional logic, and much else.Literary surveyors have helped make possible and can advance what we now call cultural analysis. In recent decades cultural theory and history have changed how we read literature. Literature can return the favor. Americas achievement as a literary nation has contributed creatively to its accomplishment as a self-critical nation. The surveyors convened herein wrote novels, stories, plays, poetry, essays, autobiography, journals, and cultural criticism. Surveyors of Customs explores literatures insights into how America--its soft capitalism, its democratized inequality, its Americanization of power--ticks.Historical--and timely--questions abound. When and why did capitalism invest in the secular soul-making business and what roles did literature play in this? What does literature teach us about its relationship to the establishment of a personnel culture that moved beyond self-help incentive-making and intensified Americans preoccupations with personal life to turn them into personnel? How did literature contribute to the reproduction of classless class relations and what does this say about dress-down politics and class formation in our Second Gilded Age?